By Benjamin Reuter
The
section in A Citizen’s Guide to Grassroots Campaigns on saving the swamps and
other landmarks was pretty interesting. I always knew about the certain
organizations of groups that got together to tackle these kinds of problems but
I never knew about the little details that went into gathering the people or
even the first steps to take towards such a goal. The people that were quoted
in this section all seemed to have a common bond towards the specific section
of nature that they were trying to save.
The bird watchers that loved
seeing the migration of birds through the wetlands 20 miles west of Newark banded together with other community
people in the surrounding area in order to stop the encroachment of larger and
more expansive airport systems being built atop the beautiful marshland of the Great Swamp.
In Northern Morris
County, a group of
environmentalists banded together in the 1980’s to stop the deforestation and
rural expansion that was happening along Interstate 287 and Highway 23. The
local communities banded together by word of mouth communication as well as getting
into contact with the local service authorities in order to stop this growth of
building and destruction of nature in the Farny Highlands area.
In the
section dealing with the Farny Highlands I was curious to read that in order to
save this particular area of the land the community needed to put a ‘name’ on
the area. Why do you need to name a particular area in order to save it? Is it
a type of claiming that happens to be an unwritten rule? I do not see why a
group of people that are looking to save a particular section of forests need
to put a stamp on it. What’s wrong with rallying to save a piece of land
without putting a name to it?
No comments:
Post a Comment